User Tools

Site Tools


technobull:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
technobull:start [2023/02/03 16:28] mtbtimelinetechnobull:start [2023/02/03 18:58] (current) mtbtimeline
Line 61: Line 61:
 \\ \\
  
-Is this a modern rebuild, using some very nice BMX parts consistent with 1982?  Or is it all original?  The frame is unlike all later Sherpas.  Did Sattler put a DE10, which has 30T capacity, on a mountain bike?  In early 1982, the only decent derailleur was the Sachs-Huret Duopar, which had reliability issues.  So, perhaps this is all original?  If not, it not, it remains an early evolutionary step for Technobull.+Is this a modern rebuild, using some very nice BMX parts consistent with 1982?  Or is it all original?  The frame is unlike all later Sherpas.  Did Sattler put a DE10, which has 30T capacity, on a mountain bike?  In early 1982, the only decent derailleur was the Sachs-Huret Duopar, which had reliability issues.  So, perhaps this is all original?  If not, it remains an early evolutionary step for Technobull.
 </div> </div>
 <div column 45%> <div column 45%>
Line 142: Line 142:
 ---- ----
 ===== 1989 Sherpa ===== ===== 1989 Sherpa =====
-The Sherpa has barely changed in seven years.  This has a couple of extra details, and was probably built up for touring (pump peg, extra rack tabs.)+The Sherpa has barely changed in seven years.  This example has a couple of extra details, and was probably built up for touring (pump peg, extra rack tabs.)
 \\ \\
  
technobull/start.1675470529.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/02/03 16:28 by mtbtimeline